Use the tools below to refine your search by only displaying reviews with a certain number of star ratings or to only show reviews from a certain time period. Eg click on '1 star' to just display the reviews we have which received a 1 star rating click or 'Within the last month' to display just reviews posted over the last month.
Written on: 13/10/2009
I bought this camera 6 years ago & recently took it on my overseas trip. On my return I began showing people my photos & they all asked "what camera equipment do I use? I told them my camera was an old digital & they didn't believe me. Daytime shots are perfect, although night shots are horrible with this camera. Overall it has been a great camera… Read Full Review
Written on: 22/07/2006 by M Burrows (1 review written)
The Casio after service is shocking, and no-one wants to know. As for the helpline - their only reply is "send the Casio QV R4 digital camera back by registered mail, and we will give you an estimate for a repair. Surely when one of their camera's develops the same fault twice they should show some concern?
There are far better camera's around than the Casio QV R4… Read Full Review
Written on: 15/12/2005 by ddisfordmc (1 review written)
The Casio QV R4 digital camera has some useless functions that could have been eliminated (photo montage feature). I've been using this camera for about a year-and-a-half, and every time I have to use it I cringe. It was a gift from family.
After the first week I returned the camera because the batteries were always dying, and frequently the lens closes up in mid-shot. I thought this was an obvious defect so I sent it back to dealer. It was returned after a few weeks, certified by Casio to… Read Full Review
Written on: 15/03/2005 by DewDropPony (1 review written)
I think the two best qualities of the Casio QV R4 camera are all the options and the image quality. It has a setting for pretty much anything. There's one for just taking pictures of fireworks, flowers, faces, city life in the night, city life in the day time, taking pictures of text, taking pictures of pictures, I think pets and a lot more than that that I can't remember anymore. I read somewhere that cameras that usually have that many settings don't have very good picture quality. That… Read Full Review
Written on: 18/01/2003 by Keith Lloyd. (1 review written)
Bought my camera on the 28th December 2002 with a 128Mb SDcard. Simply I love this camera, if I could marry it I would. My last Digital camera a Brick (Kodak DC290) in size and weight did not produce images as good as this camera does. Today took a pcture of a woodpecker eating peanuts in my garden today and the finished printed picture is brilliant. My main use for this camera is to assist me in my hobby of metal detecting in the U.K. I use macro photography mainly and this camera brings out… Read Full Review
Written on: 06/01/2003 by mick. (1 review written)
This overall, is a superb camera. If you are reading reviews, wondering wheather or not to buy it, definatly do, it's superb. It's exceptional value to get a 4.0MegaPixel camera for this price… Read Full Review
" Junk unreliable product and bad customer servive " Read More
Written by revieweverything
" Decent camera let down by noisy images and slow autofocus " Read More
Written by AgentSmith1980s
" Camera for non photographer " Read More
" Great for travelling and bloggers " Read More
Written by reviewkitten
" This is my first digital camera, and the quality is more than toler... " Read More