Use the tools below to refine your search by only displaying reviews with a certain number of star ratings or to only show reviews from a certain time period. Eg click on '1 star' to just display the reviews we have which received a 1 star rating click or 'Within the last month' to display just reviews posted over the last month.
Written on: 26/11/2002 by Biggles. (1 review written)
really good starter camera, however there are cheaper and better on the market for what you get. Make sure you get a good repair plan with your camera for up to 3 years!… Read Full Review
Written on: 15/12/2000 by amberman. (1 review written)
I bought this digital camera as a Jenoptic JD12 - same camera but only £119. It has 800k pixels which gives you plenty of spare to produce more that adequate pictures for websites at 320x240. It works best in good light where the pictures are acceptably sharp. You can make up for the lack of zoom by cropping down to this size.
It will take good pictures in good fluorescent lighting but gets very fuzzy in low light. The built-in flash works well but has a limited range (1-1.5m).
The TWAIN… Read Full Review
Written on: 27/05/2000 by Godrot. (1 review written)
OK, so it's a budget camera. Does that mean I have to be nice? The Samsung Digimax feels tacky, light and plasticky, like a kiddie's toy camera. NOT what I would fancy forking out £150 for. The lens is focus-free (they couldn't afford a TTL autofocus system at this price) and gives consistently fuzzy, badly out of focus results. I can honestly say that the lens is focus-free. Never once did it come close to focussing while I used it.
The controls are fiddly, as there is only an LCD on top of… Read Full Review
" KVKkQgoqaY0P " Read More
" Some call it a Go Pro copy- I call it a Go Pro beater! " Read More
Written by Apocalypse_barbie
" Decent camera let down by noisy images and slow autofocus " Read More
Written by AgentSmith1980s
" Sony QX10 Lens Style Cameraь - " Read More
Written by JosieVanhorn
" It works great. " Read More