Written on: 27/04/2009
Owners of Nokia 8910 certainly know who is fool ;-))) I used tgis one for a year, now I own 8910i. It is may be one of the best designed phones like 8800, RAZR, Vertu Ascent. (read more)
Written on: 17/03/2003 by Mij.
This phone is garbage basically. The reason for this is that it is basically an 8210 with bluetooth which has been put into a fancy cover and then you are charged between £400 - £500 for it. HELLO WAKE UP U FOOLS, U ARE BEING CONNED. U can get an 8210 for about £60 now and then you can get that fancy cover as an xpress on for just £5.00. Come on people wake up and smell the bloody coffee U ARE BEING RIPPED OFF!!!!!!! (read more)
Written on: 10/04/2003
titanium is significantly more expensive than plastic!!!!!
<br>
Written on: 07/05/2003
man this reviewer is a total moron!hello were talking about the titanium here!! u know how much titanum cost this days!
Written on: 09/08/2004
Then don't make phones out of it!!! Too expensive!!!
Written on: 13/03/2003 by RICHIE.
The phone is just to good for me. Its stylish and easy to use. They are also quick to send messages. (read more)
Written on: 02/09/2004
Did the Nokia 8910 phone come with a magnifying glass so you can see it's tiny screen?
Written on: 18/02/2003 by Stephen Sadler.
Well, I'm a couple of months into owning my 'Black 8910' and it really has not put a foot wrong (do Nokia's ever!) Although the titanium case is incredibly strong, put the phone in your pocket with a couple of coins for a while and it will scratch, although I think this would only be a problem with the painted black model. In every day use the phone is faultless - signal handling is brilliant and the battery gets better with age! The only serious drawback with this phone, as mentioned by... (read more)
Written on: 29/12/2002 by Niro.
Expensive?...yes. Exclusive?...yes. Quality?...great. Features?...hmmm.
The Nokia 8910 mobile phone is clearly aimed at the professional or business-person. No gimmicks, simply a flagship business phone. I have had this phone for 4 months now, and still have my T68i too. I use the T68i when I go to America, and when I know that I shan't be able to charge the battery for a couple of days. The T68i is a great phone, and arguably the best overall on the market, but for sheer exclusivity and a...
(read more)
Written on: 28/12/2002 by Mark Glammy.
I've moved up from an 8850, bit of a sideways move really because the 8910 is much the same. Although you will notice a much faster processor - texts open faster and the stupid snowboading game is not as jerky What really makes the difference is the titanium casing and bluetooth (if you need it) the sliding mech' seems much stronger than the 8850 cover. For its size the phone is heavy, I like this because you feel like you get more for your money! I've only used it for a couple of days, I... (read more)
Written on: 10/12/2002 by Joey Ofracio.
It's features define it's personality and in accordance with style it is superb! (read more)
Written on: 09/12/2002 by zoran.
I've have this phone one week and I'm so happy to have this fantastic phone. (read more)
Written on: 03/12/2002 by Derek Broadhurst.
When I first picked up this phone I noticed straight away that it had an air of great quality. No ill-fitting, fragile plastic casing here, a nice feel of real metal. One of the best features (maybe just for showing off) is the opening mechanism, which while covering ALL of the keys (not like the 8850) is used to start and end calls. The only bad points with this phone I have found is that in the dark, the numbers above the keys are not illuminated, so unless you know where the numbers are... (read more)
Written on: 17/11/2002 by noble.
MOBILE PHONE TYPES STILL THE BEST, SUCH AS 8310, 8330 (read more)
Written on: 16/11/2002 by Soon H Ting.
Very Good Design, Cool & Stylish!! The Automatic Cover. I like very much!! World masterpiece again by Nokia. The things I don't like are -no Colour Screen, No Composer, No Polyphonic Ringtones, Why is it so expensive without this features??? If Nokia 8910 have above features even more than $1000 I still want to buy it!!! This is why sometimes Nokia fans don't like it. The good pricing should have good features!!!! At last I still like this phones. (read more)
Written on: 02/12/2002
Polyphonic ringtones are not necessary with this phone. These "options" don't fit with this "business" phone but are far more suited for "kids"phones. A composer can be found on the accompanying CD-rom. Using the infrared port you can compose as much as you want. The primary benefit of this phone is the fact that it's very solid and that it delivers the functions that Nokia promises very well. The only disadvantages for business use are the fact that it's not a triple band and cards can not be sent by bluetooth. In general it's a great phone (but a bit expensive)
Written on: 14/10/2002 by Fubar.
Nokia's 8910 is a real stylish masterpiece. The titanium cover makes it quite heavy but it feels great. The sliding mechanism is impressive. I just hope it stays that way after a while (no problems so far). The reception is good, bluetooth works OK (with motorola headset) and the reception is good in all circumstances (battery-life: 5-6 days). The screen is not in colour but I don't think this is necessary (same with polyphonic ringtunes). It does have a nice grey light though. The keypad... (read more)
Written on: 29/10/2002
I've had the phone for 2 months now. Still no problems with the opening mechanism. Battery life has prolonged to 1 week. I still think this is a great phone. No complaints.
Written on: 07/09/2002 by Derek Broadhurst.
When I first picked up this phone I noticed straight away that it had an air of great quality. No ill-fitting, fragile plastic casing here, a nice feel of real metal. One of the best features (maybe just for showing off) is the opening mechanism, which while covering ALL of the keys (not like the 8850) is used to start and end calls. The only bad points with this phone I have found is that in the dark, the numbers above the keys are not illuminated, so unless you know where the numbers... (read more)
Written on: 08/11/2002
Too expensive though for a mobile with no colour screen, no keypad backlight & not a triband model.
Written on: 30/08/2002 by Chris Dela Cruz.
I got my Nokia 8910 mobile phone last July because I thought that this cellphone would be one of Nokia's great fones, but it turned out that it's going to be a sad story. When the 7650 was released here in Manila around 3rd week of July, I immediately sold my 8910 and bought the 7650. No regrets so far with my new fone. 8910 will just blind you with its casing but not really with its features. (read more)
Written on: 06/09/2002
Hey there Belive me I love the 8910. I have the midnight edition one and it's the best phone I have used. Firm and nice to hold and also very responsive. I also bought the 7650 when it came out but I hate it as it feels like a plastic toy. The joy stick is the the only firm part in the phone. The slide is awful and shakes a lot when open and so is the camera. I am sure the t68i camera gives a better pic when transfered to your PC. The sync in the 7650 is terrible too. The time lags once you sync and the call log goes crazy. Nokia has to yet get all the bugs out of the phone. Try this when you get a text message: click on option and try to call from there see what happens ok. The 8910 is completly stable and has no problem. Even the call log in the 7650 take tim to update its self when you open it. Well see for yourself.
<br>Well, I think 8910 is a class apart and the best phone in the market. If you want to use a good phone wih a camera then get the P800.
<br>Well people enjoy your 8910 currently I use it with a compaq 3870 via bluetooth.
<br>Well enjoy the 8910 for thoes who have it.
<br>
<br>
Written on: 08/11/2002
Too expensive for a phone with no triband, has no keypad backlight & no colour screen. I agree with the last notes. I have an SonyEricsson T68i and the pictures are great, ok, so you have to connect the camera (a bit of a pain) but an excellent wee phone & cheaper than both the Nokia 7650 and the 8910 with more features. It only lacks colours compared to the 7650 & screen res is smaller. But does not feel like the toy that the 7650 does & no software bugs.
Written on: 06/01/2003
The Nokia 8910 and the 7650 must not be compared with because of the obvious fact that the 7650 is a colored display phone. It's like comparing a diesel truck and a ford V8 truck. If you want to compare the 7650 with, then compare it with the 8910i.. and tell me again which one is better.
Written on: 19/05/2003
i have a t68i sonyericsson and an 8910 nokia.
<br>i think nothing compares to nokia and the 8910 doesn't compare to any nokia on the market.
<br>if you need a camera and you want the best phone in the world,buy an 8910i and the new bluetooth digicam from benefon.it's the perfect combination,but it costs very much.
<br>if you want a phone better than this and you have 20.000$ try nokia vertu.nokia vertu is a phone with no color display,no mms,it has an antenna,heavy,bigger than 8910...but it's made of platinum. you can see it at
<br>
<br>http://www.threegmobile.net/gallery/vertu/
<br>
<br>bye bye
<br>siello1@xnet.ro
Written on: 30/06/2002 by Lee.
On the first look at the Nokia 8910 you can see a skinny mobile phone w/big 'shoulders'. Its clean titanium casing and spring loaded mechanism really catches the eye. I get tons of attention whenever I use it. The black one is cooler.
The keypad buttons are slim dims for most people.
It's not very useful in the dark 'cause the keypad is not backlighted.
You need to press open its cover to do basic things like accept/reject call, though I've not tested its voice commands yet.
The other...
(read more)
Written on: 08/11/2002
Yeah but too expensive for a phone with no Triband, no colour screen & no keypad lights. How stupid was that, no keypad lights!!
Written on: 17/06/2002 by Kris.
Personally I thought that even though the Nokia 8910 mobile phone has not got a colour screen phone (like 7210) or neither does it have polyphonic ringtone, but it's still a premium phone... :-) If you can afford one then the functions are great! ENJOY! (read more)
Written on: 08/11/2002
Yeah but no backlight on the keypad and not a Tri band & should be for the price.
As rated by real users
"A great phone and easy to use." Read More
"Best phone i had " Read More
"LAL J WAHLA" Read More
"The best trade in smartphones" Read More
"LG KC910 Nothing but problems ..." Read More
Gihan.'s Response to 80752_Mij.'s Review
Written on: 10/04/2003
writer is obviously not waare of the cost of titanium. there are no titanium x press on covers.also the HDSC processer is much faster than the conventional processors.