Kenwood IH100 Reviews

★★☆☆☆
2 / 5
From 7 reviews
14% of users recommend this
  • Ease of Use

  • Durability

  • Style

  • Service & Support

  • Value For Money

Media Gallery for Kenwood IH100

Kenwood-IH100.jpg

Latest Reviews

★★☆☆☆
Kenwood IH100

“Poor”

Written on: 07/09/2011 by gpmd1

After 17 months the outer casing cracked for no apparent reason. Only having used this occasionally I can only assume there is an inherent defect especially having read other reviews on the subject (read more)

Report this review
★★☆☆☆
Kenwood IH100

“It's very difficult to fry on it. Bad price/quality...”

Written on: 07/02/2011

It's very difficult to fry on it. Bad price/quality ratio. The only benefit is a cute design. (read more)

Report this review
★☆☆☆☆
Kenwood IH100

“I bought a Kenwood IH100 recently and it worked for...”

Written on: 26/04/2009

I bought a Kenwood IH100 recently and it worked for about 5 minutes before giving an error code. The booklet states it needed to be returned to a service department. I'm awaiting a replacement. (read more)

Report this review
★★☆☆☆
Kenwood IH100

“The Kenwood IH100 looks nice.boils water very quickly...”

Written on: 25/02/2009

The Kenwood IH100 looks nice.boils water very quickly but temperature control appears lacking, it beeps too loud. It's relatively expensive, mine did cost 100 euro. (read more)

Report this review
★★★☆☆
Kenwood IH100

“The Kenwood IH100 is well built/packaged and looks...”

Written on: 26/05/2008

The Kenwood IH100 is well built/packaged and looks good. The molded outer plastic frame is fairly rugged, and is not noticeably warmed during use.

The fan is a little noisy, however it is equivalent to the noise produced from a fan oven. Another reviewer mentioned that it beeps too often, I cannot see a problem with this;

It beeps when it is turned on.
It beeps when the pan is removed from the heat source, after about five seconds - then shuts down, however it will resume heating after it... (read more)

Report this review
★★★★☆
Kenwood IH100

“After checking that a magnet would stick to the bottom...”

Written on: 24/02/2008 by nickmurdoch (1 review written)

After checking that a magnet would stick to the bottom of my pans (required for the induction to work), I decided to buy this because I was told it was more efficient than a normal plug-in hob, and it certainly looks nicer than one!
I was pleasantly surprised by how efficient this actually is -- it boiled a saucepan of water about as fast as a cheap kettle would, on full power. The fan's a little loud but no louder than, say, an extractor fan, and overall I'm very impressed with it. (read more)

Report this review
★☆☆☆☆
Kenwood IH100

“I don't recommend for any body (even my worst enemy)...”

Written on: 19/06/2007 by makadia (1 review written)

I don't recommend for any body (even my worst enemy) to buy this appliance. (read more)

Nickmurdoch's Response to makadia's Review

Written on: 24/02/2008

I think the reviewer was rather unfair on this product just because they didn't know the limitations of an induction cooker. There's a good page on wikipedia about how it works, but the basic point is that if a magnet sticks to the base of your pan, this will work, but if a magnet doesn't stick to the base of the pan, it won't.

Reply to this comment
Report this review Read 1 Comment
overview