Have a picture of Nikon Nikkor AF-S Zoom 17-35mm f/2.8 IF-ED 35mm SLR Lens?, please send it to us.
| Sharpness | 10/10  |
|---|---|
| Value for Money | 6.3/10 |
| Overall rating | 6.8/10 |
| Nikon Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S DX Lens |  | £864.45Free P&P |
Full review by
Guest.
on 9th Jul 2008
User Rating : 10
Respect :
0
Good Points: Great color, contrast, range and build! If you're in to wide angle, this will cover it.
Bad Points: None really. A bit heavy but not bad. I'm use to it by now.
General comments: I've used the Nikon Nikkor AF-S Zoom lens for a little over a year now. I really have no complaints. I have a 3 lens setup. This one and a 50MM Nikkor prime and either the 75-150MM F3.5 E or the 80-200MM F2.8 AF ED. These lenses cover pretty much what I need.
Guest.'s review and ratings | 84 words
Review by
krimo
on 30th Jan 2008
User Rating : 10
Respect :
0
Yes its expensive - for good reason...
krimo's full review | 14 words
Review by
Anthony Wong.
on 12th Aug 2000
User Rating : 2
Respect :
-15
For those of you bone-heads who worship this lens, why don't you try shooting at 17mm/f2.8 and 20mm/f2.8, blow up the print and judge the results? I have tried this lens and got the following results: (1) significant barrel distortion (2) soft at the corners (3) vignetting. This product is far from perfect, and any good photographer can comment on the results. The Tokina 20-35/f2.8 is by far the better performer, at more reasonable cost, if you are looking for quality, not merely brand. To me, t ...
Anthony Wong.'s full review | 129 words | 3 comments added.
Review by
Mel Gregory.
on 12th May 2000
User Rating : 9
Respect :
+1
I do not own this lens but had an opportunity to borrow one for a couple of test rolls. This lens is PRO quality but one must know when and where to use the wide end of the lens. It does not distort if used correctly and is sharp at all apertures. There are many other reviews of this lens and uniformly, they praise this lens. Objectively and subjectively, this lens is an EXPENSIVE, HEAVY winner. And, hey, I like heavy!!!
Mel Gregory.'s full review | 107 words
Review by
CyberPOP.
on 4th May 2000
User Rating : 0
Respect :
-15
Hard to say how good this lens is. But this lens is one of many problems to cause me and many friends change to other system. If you have this lens handy, shoot it at f/2.8 and see what happen!
CyberPOP.'s full review | 77 words | 3 comments added.
Review by
Dana A. Hess.
on 3rd May 2000
User Rating : 10
Respect :
+1
I waited several years for Nikon to introduce this lens. Now I'm glad I did. The Silent-Wave motor is incredible. Focusing is fast and almost inaudible. If you shoot as many wide-angle shots as I do you'll want this fabulous optic. It's especially handy when you're covering any kind of social gathering. You can get fairly tight group portraits at 35mm or get the whole room at 17mm! (By the way, after using this lens for a while, 35mm seems like a short tele!) In all a star performer if y ...
Dana A. Hess.'s full review | 135 words | 1 comment added.
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
