Chevrolet Matiz 1.0 SE Reviews

Watch this item
3.4 stars
Average rating for this product is: 3.4 out of 5

From 0 ratings and 4 reviews

Thumb up 50% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item


Average Ratings for Chevrolet Matiz 1.0 SE

  • Performance3.4 stars
  • Practicality3.6 stars
  • Reliability4.3 stars
  • Value for Money4 stars
  • Overall rating3.4 stars

4 Reviews For Chevrolet Matiz 1.0 SE

  • Guest 16th Apr 2009

    Reviewer rating: 2.5 stars


    Guest's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review



    Bad Points: this is a 1 litre - the last was a 900 but it has less power. no one stocks the exhaust system (they have the daiwoo but not chevrolet) except the dealer who is quoting over £500


    General comments: this is my second matiz. loved the old one but this one is not so good

  • funfutures 12th Nov 2008

    Reviewer rating: 4.5 stars


    funfutures's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review


    I bought a Chevrolet Matiz Manual 1.0 SE Flare in Mica pearl black with air conditioning and a sunroof for £6,750 in September 2007. Along with this the car has a 3 year, 60,000 mile warranty and 3 years free servicing.
    Not a Rolls Royce. But the Chevy Matiz is a great car, nothing gets anywhere near it for value and running costs. To date 12/11/08 it has covered over 11,000 trouble free miles.
    We often journey 4 up with a full load of luggage to our holiday home in Essex, a journey of ar ...

  • Guest 25th Mar 2008

    Reviewer rating: 5 stars


    Guest's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review


    This is a great car with lots of things going for it I get on average 68 MGP in the winter and 74MPG in the summer now you cant say that's bad for a 4 seater city car which is great on the motorways too.

  • xray Rank: Lance Corporal 5th Mar 2007

    Reviewer rating: 1.5 stars


    xray's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review


    This car is claimed to be lighter than the Daewoo version yet consumes 20% more fuel, in fact this car uses more petrol than my 1600cc Toyota, that has a carburettor!