Fiat Multipla 1.9 JTD Eleganza Reviews

Watch this item
2.4 stars
Average rating for this product is: 2.4 out of 5

From 2 ratings and 2 reviews

Thumb down 0% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item

Average Ratings for Fiat Multipla 1.9 JTD Eleganza

  • Performance3.3 stars
  • Practicality4.5 stars
  • Reliability1.3 stars
  • Value for Money2.8 stars
  • Reviewer Ratings2 stars
  • Overall Rating2.4 stars

2 Reviews For Fiat Multipla 1.9 JTD Eleganza

  • Guest 17th Oct 2008

    Reviewer rating: 1.5 stars


    Guest's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!

    Report this review



    Good Points: Love the 3 seats in the front and 3 in the back. it also has some nice interior features.


    General comments: A great design on paper, but the quality of build is poor. We have had no end of problems with the Fiat Multipla, the gear stick has come off. The door trims have come off. The driver seat does not adjust. The alarm has broken. The immobilizer was faulty and has been removed. The starter motor has been replaced twice and the car still has an unresolved starting problem. The hand brake cable seized and snapped. The passenger door handle is faulty. The rear doors creak loudly. Our clutch snapped. Various suspension problems (very costly) front middle seat broke. The list goes on... I do not recommend this car due to the above problems and more I am sure I have missed.

  • GWB Rank: Corporal 7th Dec 2006

    Reviewer rating: 2.5 stars


    GWB's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!

    Report this review


    Very disappointing in that this Fiat Multipla 1.9 JTD Eleganza is a perfectly good car of its type and which for my requirements 'pushed all the right buttons'. The failure to find the cause of the problem put me right off Fiat - what is the point of marketing something that you don't know how to fix when it goes wrong?
    The dealer eventually agreed to a refund after 3 weeks of trying to get him to understand his obligations under the Sale of Goods Act - his initial stance was to hide behind Fia ...