Have a picture of SMK Spitfires .22 pellets?, please send it to us.
| Value for Money | 5.2/10  |
|---|---|
| Overall rating | 2.8/10 |
Full review by
Guest.
on 21st Jul 2008
User Rating : 2
Respect :
0
Good Points: They fire from the gun
Bad Points: Worst accuracy is achieved with them
General comments: They have a mind of their own, totally useless! Definatly worth spending a few extra quid on a good pellet
Guest.'s review and ratings | 31 words
Review by
eliteuk
on 10th Feb 2008
User Rating : 1
Respect :
0
Very Bad, just cheap bullets
eliteuk's full review | 31 words
Review by
Cognition
on 15th Jun 2007
User Rating : 8
Respect :
+1
SMK Spitfires will never win any matches, nor will they give spectacular results - but at the end of the day, they do the purpose that they were designed for.
Make no mistakes - Spitfires are "cheap and cheerful" pellets, so don't expect too much of them. They perform ok, but you won't be swept away.
It's worth remembering that these pellets aren't half bad for the price.
Despite what other members have said about these pellets, I would recommend them to anyone who doesn't require anyth ...
Cognition's full review | 89 words
Review by
lukeyboy2006
on 24th Mar 2007
User Rating : 0
Respect :
0
These pellets are terrible 3/4 of them don't even fire. Stay away from these pellets because they get stuck in the barrel!
lukeyboy2006's full review | 50 words
Review by
carlos777uk
on 2nd Jun 2006
User Rating : 3
Respect :
+1
Cheap pellets and it shows.
In testing the SMK Spitfires pellets I sighted up at 27.5yds (25m) at a regular Bisley paper target. I was seeing the difference between a quality pellet (Bisley Super Field) and these and whether it made any difference.
From the 4 pellets that actually hit a score (2 missed rather unbelievably) they were 1,2,3 and 3. Compared to the Bisley's grouping of 4,4,5 and 5 (5 is bullseye).
Now, I'm not the best shooter in the world but shot from a standing position ...
carlos777uk's full review | 174 words | 1 comment added.
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
