Rover 25 1.4 16v 103ps Streetwise S Reviews

Watch this item
Rover 25 1.4 16v 103ps Streetwise S
4.5 stars
Average rating for this product is: 4.5 out of 5

From 0 ratings and 1 review

Thumb up 100% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item

Average Ratings for Rover 25 1.4 16v 103ps Streetwise S

  • Performance5 stars
  • Practicality4.5 stars
  • Reliability4.5 stars
  • Value for Money5 stars
  • Overall rating4.5 stars

1 Review For Rover 25 1.4 16v 103ps Streetwise S

  • mwe Rank: Sergeant 8th Mar 2006

    Reviewer rating: 4.5 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful

    Report this review



    Good Points: 1) Semi-sports, warm-hatch compromise between normal 25 & hot-hatch MGs.
    2) Value for money.
    3) Tragically & fatally underrated.
    4) Very spacious in front seats.
    5) Big boot & split/fold rear seats.
    6) Mostly good build & trim quality & reliable, despite minor quality control issues.
    7) Vulnerable areas like frontal area & wheelarches protected by tough, dark-grey plastic.
    8) Handling.
    9) Very comfortable half-leather sports seats.
    10) Powerful, torquey engine pulls smoothly from 20 MPH in 5th & does 3,300 RPM at 70 MPH.
    11) Future classic?


    Bad Points: 1) Poor rear headroom for a car that's 13 feet long.
    2) Minor quality control problems.
    3) Standard 18-inch wiper blades are too small, leaving large, unswept areas.


    General comments: Arguably the best version of Rover 25;- good compromise between normal 25s & 'in your face' overtly sporty MGs.
    Never mind the list price, dealers sold these for £7,900 brand-new (NOT pre-registered!);- a grown up car for less than one of the higher spec Ford KAs!
    Powerful 103ps engine means no cheap tax & dearer insurance than similarly priced smaller superminis;- HOWEVER compared with overrated, slightly larger foreign rivals like Golf & Focus, the MG ZRs & Rover 25s are an absolute bargain;- about HALF the price of a comparable specification Golf or Focus. £7900 would buy a mid to high spec 5-year-old 50,000 mile Golf or Focus!
    MG ZR & Rover 25 are tragically underrated;- they should've been consistent top-five best-sellers & as big worldwide as Golf & Focus are.
    It's particularly galling that current Focus looks like a second-rate Korean copy of a Rover 25;-yet it's MG-Rover, not Ford that have gone bust & are having their production lines switched to China.
    One minor complaint is MG Rover's quality control at Longbridge wasn't up to Nissan's Sunderland standards:- My 25 Streetwise had a gearknob that can come off in your hand, loose rubber trim on the nearside rear door when I picked the car up & a load space cover attachment broke at less than 3,000 miles.