4 Reviews for Morphy Richards 73172 ORB Bagless Cylinder Cleaner Reviews

Watch this item
Morphy Richards 73172 ORB Bagless Cylinder Cleaner
1.1 stars
Average rating for this product is: 1.1 out of 5

From 0 ratings and 4 reviews

Thumb down 0% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item

Morphy Richards 73172 ORB Bagless Cylinder Cleaner Reviews

Sort Reviews

  • Guest 26th Mar 2009

    Reviewer rating: 1.5 stars


    Guest's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!

    Report this review



    The Morphy Richards 73172 ORB Bagless Cylinder Cleaner is light, compact, easy to use, tools easy to change. Dust canister easy to lift out and empty. Hepa washable filter.
    The orb is light and compact, easy to manoeuvre in awkward areas such as under furniture and radiators and in small rooms a ...

  • Guest 10th Jul 2008

    Reviewer rating: 0.5 stars


    Guest's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!

    Report this review



    Would NOT recommend the Morphy Richards 73172 ORB Bagless Cylinder Cleaner.
    I renew my Vacuum Cleaners every Year so over the Years I have had many designs and makes.
    I can Honestly say this is the worse Cleaner I have ever owned.
    Design is just horrible.
    I wont be coming back for another Morphy Ric ...

  • Sean Seery Rank: Lance Corporal 2nd May 2006

    Reviewer rating: 2.5 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful

    Report this review



    I have only had this Morphy Richards Bagless Cylinder Cleaner for a few days and find it a very disappointing product. I would urge people who are considering this 73172 ORB to think again. You will be disappointed

  • Aloan Rank: Lance Corporal 12th Aug 2005

    Reviewer rating: 0 stars


    Aloan's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!

    Report this review



    We bought this to use in our holiday caravan, so it was only to be used for a relatively small area of carpet. The suction is so poor, that vacuuming becomes a lengthy, tiring and hot task. This was disappointing considering the specification looked extremely good for the money. It actually seems ...