20 Reviews for Kodak EasyShare CX4300 Reviews

trotski118's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Report this review

Initially the Kodak EasyShare was a good looking camera & with the Kodak name you expect a good quality product. Unfortunatally it is a cheap & shoddy camera with a terrible battery life. Something you would buy in the market place at a third of the price. In a word rubbish.

gshore's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Report this review

There are so many good cameras out there now, that to me it doesn't make sense to buy this one. Problems include: 1) the infamous lens cap issue i.e. it doesn't always stay on. 2)battery hog: I find it will last about a day and half of normal shooting, although the battery low indicator comes on ab ...

joe bloggs2's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Report this review

I would not deal with P.C World again or buy another Kodak camera. I noticed an advert in the press the same week for a camera with the same spec at the same price they quoted for repair at £89.
I now have a Fuji S7000 camera that is excellent.

On average, people found this review very helpful
Report this review

I love this Kodak CX4300 digital camera. I've had mine for a year or so and never had a problem. My sons can use it with ease. Kodak's batteries dont last long but it likes rechargeables.
My only gripe is I now want it to take filters, be able to change lenses and basicaly give more control. I kno ...

On average, people found this review very helpful
Report this review

This Kodak CX4300 digital camera is excellent! The picture quality is phenomenal, my five year old son can easily take pictures with it, the batteries last forever, and the flash is really great too. Bought it at Best Buy as a refurb, and it has worked flawlessly since. I like the lens cover, and ...

Marty's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Report this review

The Kodak CX4300 is an excellent digital camera for beginners. The cost being about one hundred and fifty dollars makes this an attractive price for people just getting into digital photography. At more then 3 megapixles it is a camera that exceeds most 35 mm cameras, and can be used to transfer the ...

On average, people found this review helpful
Report this review

Beware of this digital camera!!! My friend and I each bought a Kodak CX4300 in November of 2002. By the next summer, his could no longer take photos (the "eye" was broken, but all other functions worked). By the end of the summer, mine was randomly shutting off and on. At this point, it will onl ...

On average, people found this review helpful
Report this review

Kodak should promote the CX4300 Digital camera better. I got mine from Wal Mart online during the holidays of 2002 when they first came out and payed around 150.00 US dollars. That is half of what other 3.2 mp camera cost. This is an ideal camera for the beginner while at the same time getting high ...

On average, people found this review very helpful
Report this review

This is a good overall camera. It does not have a lot of bells and whistles but for the price you can't beat it. The photos I print out on photo paper are great. No trouble with the lens cap but it would be great to have a automatic one but hey for the price I will make do. Buy this camera if you ar ...

On average, people found this review helpful
Report this review

All in all i think that this camera represents excellent value for money, and if its a family camera you are after then this will more than meet any requirements. The camera however does have alot of weaknesses, which is a shame given its terrific resolution. For me personally a camera like this nee ...