Have a picture of Praktica L - LT - LTL - MTL etc. 35mm SLR camera?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of Tomislav Duic.
Review by
jorisbens
on 13th Jan 2008
User Rating : 10
Respect :
0
Cheap camera, but with lots of possibilities, a good choice for an amateur photographer.
jorisbens's full review | 19 words
Review by
biggles44
on 8th Mar 2005
User Rating : 9
Respect :
0
Using my second Prakica after 10 years away and I realise what I'd been missing. Pentax make great SLRs, but it's nice to come back to the inventors of the pentax (HAH!) screw.
biggles44's full review | 61 words
Review by
atticusblack
on 12th Feb 2005
User Rating : 8
Respect :
0
I own 3 35mm SLR cameras (Yashica 250-af, Yashica 230-af and a Praktica LTL-3). Although the Yashicas are newer than my Praktica, it's the LTL that I use the most. I prefer the all manual operation, and although a little heavy compared to more modern slrs, it feel well built and robust.
Lenses are ...
atticusblack's full review | 94 words
Review by
robot.
on 22nd Feb 2003
User Rating : 7
Respect :
+2
Great platform for M42 screwmount lenses. They are a great buy, if you get one not corroded by battery acid.
robot.'s full review | 60 words
Review by
Guru.
on 21st Sep 2002
User Rating : 8
Respect :
+8
This review covers most of the Praktica Manual SLRs built in the 1970s-80s. The models are all similar, some had lightmeters, some had selftimers, but were basically the same camera. No "bells or whistles", these were basic manual exposure, manual focus SLRs. I owned a NOVA II in 1985, which introdu ...
Guru.'s full review | 197 words
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
