Max Spielman Review

Click here if this is your business
★★☆☆☆
2.5 / 5
40% of users recommend this
Click here if this is your business
  • Quality of service

  • Layout of shop

  • Value For Money

Camuserman's review of Max Spielman

★☆☆☆☆

“I have been using Max Spielman for quick tests of old...”

Written on: 15/03/2011 by Camuserman (1 review written)

I have been using Max Spielman for quick tests of old film cameras, by having a film developed and scanned to CD. The quality has now deteriorated to a level that can only be described as total cr@p. The shop staff do not take care of the film (it is allowed to drag on the floor); the development is often done with stale chemicals; light leaks across the film are common; scanning is very low resolution (nominally about 1.5megapixels); the image/file compression smears all details; the scan is much too high contrast. On the plus side, staff cheefully do a bad job.



There are not many more things that can go wrong or be done more badly.



Completely useless, lousy quality and awful value for money.

  • Loughborough

    Branch Visited

  • £5

    Goods purchased & cost

  • Quality of service

  • Layout of shop

  • Value For Money

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Dude22's Response to Camuserman's Review

Written on: 26/09/2011

'light leaks across the film' would surely occur if the film was opened, which they don't do in max spielmann. maybe accidents occur but i've been using them for years for 35mm film developing and much more and never had a problem.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Report this review