Written on: 06/01/2011 by WoodyJessie (1 review written)
I have two cocker spaniel's, one is 18 months old and the other is 6 months old. We have fed them both bakers since we bought them. I always thought it was a good choice and such a well known brand, that was until I bought the last lot of food. The lady in the pet shop (well known pet supermarket) advised me that it was bad for the dogs. She said it made them hyper, well having cocker spaniels I thought, they are hyper dogs anyway, so the food can't make that much difference. Then I decided to google it, I was horrified at what I was reading and decided to switch the dogs straight away to Burns. I didn't even wait, I just wanted them off Bakers straight away. They have been on Burns now for 2 weeks and OMG what a diffewrence, they have gone from pooing 6 times a day to at the most twice a day, they have both calmed down and seem generally happier dogs. I don't know how much of what I have read is true, but I do know my two dogs have changed for the better. Yes Burns is slightly dearer, BUT you have to feed them less than half of what they were having of bakers so all in all its even stevens. Even if it cost ten times as much isn't the health of your dogs more important? You could end up paying more in vets bills. PLEASE don't feed this poison to your dogs, its so not worth it!!
As rated by real users