- Review Centre
- Motoring
- Car Reviews
- Sedans
- Ford Taurus SHO
- mackdigital's review
Have a picture of Ford Taurus SHO?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of Gregg.
| Performance | 9.5/10   |
|---|---|
| Practicality | 8.8/10 |
| Reliability | 8.4/10 |
| Value for Money | 9.2/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 9.2/10 |
| Overall Rating | 8.8/10 |
By mackdigital on 24th Aug 2008
| Year Manufactured | 1995 |
|---|---|
| Length of ownership | 3 years |
| Doors | 4 |
| Performance | 10/10 |
| Practicality | 7/10 |
| Reliability | 7/10 |
| Value for money | 10/10 |
| Overall value | 9/10 |
 mackdigital's recommendation | |
The worst part about the sho is that the surrounding parts are inexpensive and sometimes downright cheap. Does not have the refinment of something like an acura or toyota. Parts are expensive (Battery costs $95.00) Working on it is a nightmare so take good care of it.
I have a 1995 Ford Taurus automatic 3.2 with 146,000 miles on it. I got mine beat up and beat down. But even with all the problems I had it still was faster and more potent that just about anything I've ever driven. The Yamaha 3.2 is quite possibly the best engine ever made. I've taken everything from eclipses, to souped up civics to Lexus 400's. City driving is fairly normal in general, but when you get on the freeway.....It's a wrap. Best car I ever had. Pound for pound its the best combination of size and performance available for the price. Comparable speed to a crysler 300 hemi but much bigger inside. Highly recommended.
mackdigital's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
