Have a picture of Babyliss Pro 230 Elegance?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of Gaynor.
| Ease of Use | 9.1/10   |
|---|---|
| Durability | 8.7/10 |
| Style | 9.4/10 |
| Service & Support | 6.7/10 |
| Value for Money | 8.5/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 9.1/10 |
| Overall Rating | 9/10 |
By deedee08 on 23rd Aug 2008
| Owned Product For | Under 1 month |
|---|---|
| Model (eg. SCP 5.2a) | babyliss pro 230 elegance |
| Does Product Have a Hologram? | No |
| Special Features | Not supplied |
| Ease of Use | 1/10 |
| Durability | 5/10 |
| Style | 5/10 |
| Service & Support | 0/10 |
| Value for money | 3/10 |
| Overall value | 3/10 |
 deedee08's recommendation | |
straightens hair alright...but......
the handle gets so hot that after sometime, its impossible for me to hold!
Looking at all the wonderful reviews of Babyliss Pro 230 Elegance, I decided to buy this straightener and was very happy to get it at half price from argos. its transparent box revealed a gleaming bronzy straightener and looked amazing from outside. but my happiness was short lived when i actually opened the box and started to use it. first of all, being a such an expensive one (original cost 74 pounds) it doesn't have a digital display and the plastic used seems substandard to me (buttons are very rickety). secondly the handles heats up so much that after a min or so, i find it impossible to hold them properly. i don't know if it is a problem with my pair only since not a single person has mentioned anything about this. The only good thing about this product in my opinion is that it straightens the hair well (with great difficulty i did manage to straighten a section of my hair) but, what is the use if I can't even hold them?! maybe along with the heatproof mat they should also have provided heat proof gloves! i tried my friend's braun satinliner and thought they were really great, cannot compare it with babyliss!
Important, please be aware that:
deedee08's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
