Have a picture of suzuki alto-works?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of Nestor Jorquera Cancino.
| Performance | 6.9/10 |
|---|---|
| Practicality | 7.4/10 |
| Reliability | 8/10 |
| Value for Money | 7.7/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 7.3/10 |
| Overall Rating | 7.2/10 |
By sarahjacobs1 on 22nd Aug 2008
| Year Manufactured | 2004 |
|---|---|
| Length of ownership | 4 years |
| Doors | 5 |
| Performance | 6/10 |
| Practicality | 8/10 |
| Reliability | 3/10 |
| Value for money | 5/10 |
| Overall value | 4/10 |
| | |
Cheap to buy, run, tax and insure.
Flimsy bodywork.
I bought my alto as a little runaround to get me to work and back. Bought it from new, within 18 months I needed a new engine as a piston broke, destroying the engine. After another 4 months another piston went. Had a year of driving problem free, and had to have a new speedo. After 16 miles the speedo broke again and have just had a new speedo sensor fitted. Luckily I had taken out an extended warrantee. Just waiting for the next thing to go wrong...... have spoken to other alto owners who have also had problems with their cars.
Important, please be aware that:

sarahjacobs1's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!