- Review Centre
- Motoring
- Car Reviews
- Vans
- Mercedes Benz VITO 111CDI LWB Extra Long
- Guest.'s review
Have a picture of Mercedes Benz VITO 111CDI LWB Extra Long?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of marc.
| Performance | 6.3/10  |
|---|---|
| Practicality | 7.5/10 |
| Reliability | 4.9/10  |
| Value for Money | 3.9/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 4.4/10 |
| Overall Rating | 5.1/10 |
By Guest. on 18th Jul 2008
| Year Manufactured | 2004 |
|---|---|
| Length of ownership | 4 years |
| Doors | 6 |
| Performance | 8/10 |
| Practicality | 8/10 |
| Reliability | 7/10 |
| Value for money | 3/10 |
| Overall value | 4/10 |
 Guest.'s recommendation | |
4 years old 60,000 miles, rust everywhere - inside roof below roof rack, wheel arches, sides, rear doors, lots of stone chips? or could be rust bubbling through. Will this be covered by the 12 years anti-perforation warranty?
I would not have another Mercedes Benz Vito unless they can rectify rusting. I could live with the other problems: 2 water leaks from loose hose clips, front tyres scrubbing- now fixed, seat splitting for second time, seat belt sticking, sliding door dropped, window cable snapped, failed turbo sensor, alarm problems-returned 7 times in first 2 months, enginner from Germany investigated problems twice, missing heater part (could not prove whose fault as I had sat nav fitted elsewhere), gears stiff, little sluggish when setting off from cold. I wished I had bought the VW Transporter, which was 2k cheaper and had a more powerful engine.
Important, please be aware that:
Guest.'s review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
