Have a picture of Intel Celeron Processor?, please send it to us.
| Quality | 8.5/10   |
|---|---|
| Ease of Set Up | 8.7/10 |
| Value for Money | 8.4/10 |
| Overall rating | 7.8/10 |
By Guest. on 11th May 2008
| Time Processor Owned | 6 - 12 Months |
|---|---|
| Ease of Set Up | 10/10 |
| Value for money | 10/10 |
| Overall value | 10/10 |
 Guest.'s recommendation | |
*low power 42W, my whole system rates under 90W at heavy load with a killawatt meter(excluding monitor and speakers)
*low price(median for a Celeron-L 420 is around $43)
Nothing at all
I build a lga775 pentium 3.0GHz(pentium 320 I think) that lags in comparison to this chip. For moderate video encoding, cd/dvd ripping and serious office application use, this is the chip to go with. Most people would complain about the onboard cache memory being low. Hey, it works better than a P4 3.0Ghz single core chip, so I can't complain. My system has a 80GB hdd and 1GB(512MB x2 dual channel) ddr2 667 and I've had no problems with performance. I had it running with xp pro sp2 for 31 days with no reboot. Temperature stays low, but I keep the CPU fan on all the time just to be sure. I don't believe that most people need/benefit from the dual core chips and three times the price. There is a reason most OEM's go with this chip. Compare gateway, dell, hp. I think you should be able to find a system on each site with this chip.
Guest.'s review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Intel Celeron Dual Core E1400 / 2 GHz processor
Intel Celeron 550 / 2 GHz processor ( mobile )
Intel Celeron 440 / 2 GHz processor
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
