Written on: 07/05/2008
It's already fallen out of favour.
I believe An Inconvenient Truth was packed full of agenda-driven propaganda. There is no scientific data to support it. Humanity has not been monitoring the planet's behaviour by the scientific method long enough to state any fact. There were just as many opinions against the hypothesis as for it, yet the Nobel panel lowered itself to estimating gesture and good intentions to be on par with the scientific method. I do not believe factual characterization to be offensive; only factual.
As rated by real users