Samsung F700 Review

Watch this item
Samsung F700
4 stars
Average rating for this product is: 4 out of 5

From 87 ratings and 35 reviews

Thumb up 69% of users recommend this product

Best Price: £FREE !

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item


Debbieb's Review of Samsung F700

2nd Apr 2008

Overall Rating

1.5 stars
  • Value for money
    2 stars
  • Time Phone Owned
    1 - 6 Months
  • Battery Life
    2 stars
  • Reception
    3.5 stars
  • Reviewers Network
    Vodaphone
  • Screen Quality
    4 stars
  • Features
    3.5 stars
  • Style
    3 stars
Good Points

Camera, memory


Bad Points

Qwerty keyboard quite fiddly and very frustrated about touch screen not responding.


General Comments

Most upset at touch screen not responding to answer and end calls - so much so that I wanted to change to a different model, but of course I was out of the 14 day period! (Thought it was just me getting used to it at first but it became apparent it was the phone.) Phoned customer services who told me that they had had no complaints about this model and told me to take it back to the shop for repair. Took it back to the shop and they told me the same - also said if it's my fault would not be covered under the warranty they gave me! Still waiting for it over 2 weeks later!

Really wish I'd chosen another model!!!

Remember - all reviews on Review Centre express the reviewer's opinion, not necessarily ours.
If you disagree with a review then please let us know by writing a review of your own or adding a comment.

Tweet This Review

On average, people found this review very helpful

How helpful did you find this review?


Members' Comments onDebbieb's Review

  • beefmonkey101 Rank: Corporal on 17th Jun 2008

    I agree with this review because... I also have the Samsung f700 and the touch screen is awful. Not so much of a problem when dialling numbers but a real pain when telephone banking and you're 15 digits into your 16 digit card number and (for example) you press 2 and it registers as 5. Also contrary to another review, the camera is very poor. Picture quality is fine but it takes about 5-6 seconds to take a photo.