- Review Centre
- Motoring
- Car Reviews
- City Cars
- Vauxhall Corsa 1.5d Merit
- TwinCam's review
Have a picture of Vauxhall Corsa 1.5d Merit?, please send it to us.
| Performance | 6.5/10  |
|---|---|
| Practicality | 8/10 |
| Reliability | 8/10 |
| Value for Money | 8/10 |
| Overall rating | 7.5/10 |
By TwinCam
on 31st Mar 2008
| Year Manufactured | 1995 |
|---|---|
| Length of ownership | Under 6 months |
| Doors | 5 |
| Performance | 4/10 |
| Practicality | 7/10 |
| Reliability | 7/10 |
| Value for money | 7/10 |
| Overall value | 6/10 |
 TwinCam's recommendation | |
Cheap to buy.
Cheap to run.
Cheap insurance.
5 door is not bad on room.
Isuzu diesel engine [fitted in some versions] are well built.
Plenty in scrap yard now so parts can cost near nothing.
Now looks Dated in design and features.
Needs power steering unless you like heavy steering.
Not the best build quality.
Front suspension wear.
Slow.
Ok here is my review of the Vauxhall Corsa [b version 1993-2000] 1.5 diesel, 5 door merit. First off i have always said i would never drive any Corsa period, until i recently needed a cheap car that was good on fuel, had cheap insurance [1.5d merit is group 4 insurance] and cheap to run all round. So i bought this Corsa, the merit version is the base model, so you don't get any toys at all. The 5 door verison is quite good on space, 4 adults and a child can fit in, and plenty of shopping etc will fit in the back, although it is not the largest boot space. Interior and controls are quite well thought out and normally easy to use, also the cloth trim aint bad. Isuzu diesel engines [fitted in some models] are well built, and reliable they have a great life span if not to abused. The non turbo diesel gives great mpg up to 70mpg, but is quite slow, although is faster than the petrol 1litre 3 cylinder version. In the diesel versions you need power steering [heavy engine] without it the steering is known to be very heavy and even i [a keen weight lifter] sometimes can find low speed parking a bit of trouble, so get power steering. Build quality is not the best in terms of everything, bar the engine, electrics are normally ok but can go bad, Rust can be a big problem on older versions, Buttons and controls are cheap and can be broken easy [tho well thought out in terms of ease of use]. Interior is nice but can fall to bits [thats everything]. Being based on the Nova before it [floor pan, supension], It handles bad compared to most cars [even of same period], this was made slightly better by Lotus in 1997 when they tweaked the suspension, but although i said it handles bad it is not the worst and does not have to bad a ride quality once up to speed on a good road, but be careful in wet conditions, diesel models will understeer more in the wet. Supension can get very worn in the front, more so on diesels [due to heavy engine]. So in summary this is a cheap car and not to bad of a car, that is very cheap to run and should be reliable, but don't think for a second it has any quality. Iam british and very proud, but buy a German or Japanese car of the same price and age and you will get a much better car by a bit, even french cars of same age/price [bar the citroen AX] are better and wont rust as bad. Later 2000 onwards Corsas are much better in everyway.
TwinCam's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
