Have a picture of Renault Clio 2.0 182 Sport 16V?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of jay.mufc.
| Performance | 9.1/10 |
|---|---|
| Practicality | 7.8/10 |
| Reliability | 8.6/10 |
| Value for Money | 9/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 9/10 |
| Overall Rating | 8.8/10 |
By dante1985 on 5th Mar 2008
| Year Manufactured | 2005 |
|---|---|
| Length of ownership | 2 Months |
| Doors | 3 |
| Performance | 9/10 |
| Practicality | 8/10 |
| Reliability | 7/10 |
| Value for money | 10/10 |
| Overall value | 9/10 |
| | |
Speed, handling, looks...everything really!
A few electrical faults - the cruise control turned off when I indicated right (random)! Interior isn't that good on the cup - give me half leather any day.
Ive had a 172, 182 and 182 cup now and the latter is the best. There is less body roll, improved handling and quicker. It also looks far better than the 172, and has the improved anthracite alloys from the standard 182. I also havn't missed any of the missing equipment. The auto wipers and lights were useful, but I would rather have the better performance - I would have bought a Range Rover if I wanted a huge degree of comfort. Amazing car (and quicker than a Golf GTI, Focus ST and equal to a Type-R - or maybe the drivers were rubbish).

dante1985's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!