Have a picture of Cloverfield?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of Anon.
| Value for Money | 5/10  |
|---|---|
| Reviewer Rating | 5.5/10 |
| Overall Rating | 6.2/10  |
By Guest. on 11th Feb 2008
| Starring Actor/Actress | Not supplied |
|---|---|
| Value for money | 0/10 |
| Overall value | 5/10 |
 Guest.'s recommendation | |
the best point was the trailer and the way the film was personal and was more into a group of friends rather than aload of random characters.
the bad points of the film being solely in handheld camera mode rather than what a normal film would be because it just tended to be a bit to far fetched.
The film wasn't really a good success because it was too far fetched. I understand that it's just a film and it has monsters in and all but no one would be a able too film that long with out the armed forces taking the camera off them, also when his battery dies on his phone he gets a new one that happens to fully charged, the film doesn't really have a point for example most films have say something happening then an explanation then a ending this just started with a guy's camera then a monster comes along we don't know how and then a bridge collapses and it ends i can see that someone might say theres a number 2 thats why that happened but it says its evidence thats been recovered form location formally know as central park so its ended basically i was actually really disappointed with the film as a whole nothing like i thought it would be as i am a big fan of lost. overall big let down because even the people in the cinema couldn't believe it was finished because there was no point to it, however i respect the film maker but i would suggest a bit more effort and make it less far fetched however I'm not a director.
Guest.'s review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
