Picture courtesy of Ted.
| Build quality | 7.2/10 |
|---|---|
| Reliability | 7.2/10 |
| Value for Money | 8.3/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 7.6/10 |
| Overall Rating | 7.7/10 |
By Guest. on 7th Jan 2008
| Year Manufactured | 2007 |
|---|---|
| Length of ownership | 0 |
| Build quality | 8/10 |
| Reliability | 8/10 |
| Value for money | 10/10 |
| Overall value | 8/10 |
| | |
Easy, cheap maintenance.... Nice looking bike... Very Comfortable to sit on. Price is unbelievable.
This goes for almost all new motorcycles.... Was NOT allowed to test ride the bike, (new or used)... so I never got see whether or not it would work for me. The Harley Dealer let me try their brand new Sportster, and I ended up going with that bike- as I knew how it worked for me. Why would a dealer expect you to plunk $$$ on a bike you've never tried is beyond me....?
It seems to me that if someone needs a go-everywhere bike to use like a commuter car (to - from work, running errands, weekend drives out of town) then the Blast is perfect. It's the equivalent of a two-wheeled econo-car for usefulness, (but with that built-in Motorcycle Fun Factor.) If your Ego needs stoking, you might need to look a little further. I still anxiously await a test-ride on one, as I think it might of swayed me from paying an extra $2k for the Sportster. I'm happy with the Sporty, but I get the feeling the Blast would've served well, too.

Guest.'s review has yet to be rated - Be the first!