Have a picture of Panda Antivirus Titanium 2004?, please send it to us.
| Ease of Set Up | 8.7/10   |
|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 7/10 |
| Value for Money | 6.3/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 5.7/10 |
| Overall Rating | 7.1/10 |
By ChrisBUK2
on 13th Nov 2007
| Time Software Used | Over 1 Year |
|---|---|
| Ease of Set Up | 9/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 |
| Value for money | 3/10 |
| Overall value | 3/10 |
 ChrisBUK2's recommendation | |
I honestly cannot think of any right now.
Heavy on system resources Very unstable and often crashes Very expensive Produces many false-positives
I found Panda to be very heavy on system resources, taking ages to load up and generally slowing down the whole PC.It also kept thinking programs like MIRC were viruses, which obviously is not the case. I think they add legit programs to their virus list just to boast to other company's how many viruses it can detect, except many of them are not even viruses!It is also very expensive at £32 - this is insane! NOD32 is MUCH, MUCH, MUCH better for £25 - or if you don't feel like splashing out on an AV because you have experience, do what I do and use a free AV like AVG anti virus.
Important, please be aware that:
ChrisBUK2's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
