Have a picture of Nissan Pulsar GTiR?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of Steven Freeland.
| Performance | 9.4/10 |
|---|---|
| Practicality | 7.3/10 |
| Reliability | 8/10 |
| Value for Money | 8.8/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 8.8/10 |
| Overall Rating | 8.4/10 |
By senie
on 4th Sep 2003
| Value for money | 10/10 |
|---|---|
| Overall value | 9/10 |
| | |
To all the people here who say their car is better...
Get a grip. Most japanese performance cars are fatastic to drive and have their own advantages and disadvantages. People can rattle on saying their car is the fastest-prove it. Go down Santa Pod and then we will respect it. To all the people argueing about the GTiR-MR2 Turbo. STANDARD FORM : 0-60 gtir is supposedly 6.1, but it feels alot quicker than that. Mr2 ranges from 6.2 down to 5.2 depending on which model. My mate has owned a gtir. i have just sold and am about to buy another mr2 turbo. another mate owns a sierra cosworth with a proven output (at flywheel) of 570bhp. The pulsar was tuned to 280bhp. My Mr2Tubro was standard. The pulsar was fractionally quicker. The cossie would be quicker if we could drive the bloody thing. It has far too much power going to the rear wheels so spins too much. To tune an MR2 Turbo ('94-) to 350bhp it will setp you back £3500-4000-i can give you a number if wanted). To tune a pulsar, i dont know!Mr2 at 350bhp will then do 0-60 in about 4 secs. No b******t. Pulsar is far more practicl than an mr2. Mr2 looks better. Although it depends on what you like looking at!!!

| Helpful | Unhelpful | Agree | Disagree |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Respect: +1
samm
on 21st Feb 2004
senie
on 23rd Feb 2004
samm
on 23rd Feb 2004
spliff1star
on 10th Mar 2005
danielc1986 on 6th Oct 2005
samm
on 4th Nov 2005