Umarex Beretta 92FS Review

Watch this item
Umarex Beretta 92FS
4.5 stars
Average rating for this product is: 4.5 out of 5

From 16 ratings and 42 reviews

Thumb up 88% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item


xxmc's Review of Umarex Beretta 92FS

1st Jun 2007

Overall Rating

5 stars
  • Value for money
    5 stars
Good Points

Feel
Weight
Accuracy
Depending on pellet it has great knock down power


Bad Points

Double action has a tight trigger


General Comments

I bought my Beretta 92FS a few days ago. Today was the first day i could spend most of the day shooting it. First I shot at a can 50 ft away and never missed all 16 shots. Next I took it to a paper target and never shot out of the black rings from 50ft. Then I took it to my favorite test. I saw a fat grey squirrel attacking the feeder. I put in a 7.9gr Crosman Hollow Point and Walther CO2. Lined the sights on his front shoulder. Clean shot it didn't even twitch.

Tweet This Review

On average, people found this review very helpful

How helpful did you find this review?


Members' Comments onxxmc's Review

  • ShotTheDot Rank: 2nd Lieutenant on 26th Jul 2008

    Beretta pistols will not kill a squirrel without it twitching, I'm sure. Unless it was a squirrel who had a triple bypass operation and was very nervous it cannot do this type of shot!

  • Doctabob Rank: Staff Sergeant on 29th Jul 2008

    Agree with SotTheDot 100%.

    I have a 92FS and although a decent enough 'plinking' gun for paper targets and INANIMATE targets at short range i.e. up to 10 yards, it most definitely not a pest control tool.

    'Cleanly' killing a squirrel with a 92FS at other than just a few yards, is a bit far fetched, and indeed 'live' targets should NOT be shot at with air pistols due to their much lower legal maximum power (at least in the UK. - they just haven't got enough power.

    Accuracy claims of the reviewer for a target distance of 50 yards are also a bit optimistic to say the least.

    If the reviewer DID actually achieve this, and can repeat this level of performance, then they should be competing at world level for their country, and be an Olympic hopeful.