Che-ez! Splash Review

Watch this item
Che-ez! Splash
4 stars
Average rating for this product is: 4 out of 5

From 0 ratings and 1 review

Thumb up 100% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item


pACMANx.'s Review of Che-ez! Splash

14th May 2003

Overall Rating

4 stars
  • Value for money
    5 stars
  • Ease of Use
    4 stars
  • Image Quality
    2.5 stars
  • Features
    4 stars
Good Points

Tiny, Light, Excellent battery life, Cool-factor, removable flash, easy software, price, mpg clips


Bad Points

No digital viewfinder, permanent RAM, flash yellows pictures, quality is mediocre at best


General Comments

Make no mistake, this is purely a toy. But what a toy! It takes something like 155 pictures in its best quality, the battery lasts ages (AAA) and is just so cool. It is very sturdy and pretty simple to use. Hell, it even takes video clips and doubles as a webcam! It will never replace a good digital camera, BUT it will replace your cheap disposable snapshot cameras that get expensive. I keep mine in my pocket (about the size of a box of tic-tacs) for whenever I see something and I just "wish I had a camera". Would be PERFECT at marti-gras...

Tweet This Review

On average, people found this review helpful

How helpful did you find this review?


Members' Comments onpACMANx.'s Review

  • shikibu. on 16th May 2003

    Here is FIRMWARE-UPGRADE files.
    By upgrading, you can get moru high pic quality and no more "too dark miss shot"

    http://che-ez.com.sg/forums/showthread.php?s=52311bc1207a5075760d3524921eb4c7&threadid=89

    ...try it carefully

  • vNs. on 8th Jun 2003

    This is the best value for money item you'll ever buy in your life, it's fun too... Good picture quality considering it's a VGA resolution camera.

  • GazMan. on 17th Jul 2003

    I bought one of these a few months ago, and sent it back because the image quality was so poor, and the macro mode simply unuseable. I thought it might have been a fault with that particular example, but the replacement I received was equally shocking. Even as a 0.3 megapixel fun camera, the image quality should be twice as good. My brother has a Che-ez Moni-Me which takes excellent shots with the same resolution sensor, so I think it's a fault with the model. I think they ought to put more effort into getting it to perform well, rather than making it look good on paper by giving it loads of memory.