SeaLife SharkDiver SL 300 Review

Watch this item
SeaLife SharkDiver SL 300
2 stars
Average rating for this product is: 2 out of 5

From 1 rating and 2 reviews

Thumb up 50% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item


DinghySailor's Review of SeaLife SharkDiver SL 300 Underwater Camera

8th Sep 2006

Overall Rating

0.5 stars
  • Value for money
    0.5 stars
Good Points

It was waterproof, and didn't leak down to 3-4m. It could also be used as a traditional compact camera.


Bad Points

Out of 3x36 exposure films used, a total of 69 photographs were available from the developer. The camera often would not take a photograph when the shutter was pressed.
Of the 69 photographs all but about 3 were unusable - the colour underwater was appalling, and the flash didn't seem to work properly. The photographs were blurred as though there was a slow shutter speed. This was even obvious on a beach shot in early afternoon in Egypt!


General Comments

The Sea Life Shark Diver SL 300 was a waste of money sadly, and a disappointment since the holiday was a once-in-a-lifetime one, and photos of dolphins, clown fish, parrot fish and puffer fish were all wasted and lost. An expensive waste I'm afraid.

Remember - all reviews on Review Centre express the reviewer's opinion, not necessarily ours.
If you disagree with a review then please let us know by writing a review of your own or adding a comment.

Tweet This Review

DinghySailor's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!

How helpful did you find this review?