call of duty 2 review

Have a picture of Call of Duty 2?, please send it to us.
 

Average Ratings

Addiction Level	8.8/10
Graphics	8.9/10
Value for Money	8.6/10
Overall rating	8.9/10

100% Recommended8 out of 8 Reviews

• Overview
• Reviews
  • j4krep's review
  • 1 Comment
• Write your review
• Ask a Question

By j4krep on 7th Sep 2006

j4krep's Ratings

Addiction Level	8/10
Graphics	10/10
Multi-player	Yes
Value for money	9/10
Overall value	8/10
j4krep's recommendation

Good Points

High quality graphics and very realistic
Excellent interactive abilities
Single Player very long

Bad Points

Multiplayer made more for PC.
The controls are hard to master for someone new to the Call Of Duty series.

General Comments

This is the first time that a Call Of Duty game has been made both for a console and the PC. Here in the Xbox 360 console version, the single player is one of the best I've ever seen in a WW II game. You have the opportunity to play as every Allied Nation playing as Pvt. Vassili in the Russian exhibition, Sgt. Davis in the British exhibition and _____ in the American exhibition. They recreated many historical battle scenes in the European side of the war, including the famous Hill 400 battle. While the Single Player is great, the downside is the multiplayer. The controls in it are some of the hardest to learn I've ever experienced. You have to have played the previous Call Of Duty games for the Xbox, so it isn't a game I'd recommend to a new person playing the Call Of Duty series for the first time. Some of the maps have been edited from the Single Player version to fit the Multiplayer, and they had even added more maps not seen in Single Player such as Brecourt, France (mp_brecourt) and Rostov, Russia (mp_harbor). But all in all, the Call Of Duty series has been impressive with every game released, and this is no exception!

Total Respect: +1