Have a picture of Dyson DC11 Telescope?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of Samantha Williams.
| Ease of Use | 4.9/10 |
|---|---|
| Durability | 5/10 |
| Style | 6.1/10 |
| Service & Support | 5.4/10 |
| Value for Money | 3.6/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 3.7/10 |
| Overall Rating | 3.5/10 |
By BAMBI 1
on 3rd Aug 2006
| Owned Product For: | More than 1 year |
|---|---|
| Special Features | Not supplied |
| Ease of Use | 0/10 |
| Durability | 0/10 |
| Style | 0/10 |
| Service & Support | /10 |
| Value for money | 0/10 |
| Overall value | 0/10 |
| | |
None
Too little space for them all, read on...
I bought this dyson having had a number of inefficient cleaners and i'm afraid i believed the hype. I think i was happy the first time i used it, then it went seriously down hill. The claim that there will never be any loss of suction? Well i guess it's right - there was never any real suction to lose. It won't pick up a crumb - having spent an eternity going over the same area, the cleaner gave in first - manged to pick up a peanut, only to spit it out when the power was turned off. My husband has had an electric shock off the metal telescopic hose, and i have lost count of the number of times i have nearly lost my thumb-nail when trying to empty the vacuum - a bad design fault. I have cleaned the filter more times than i care to remember, emptied the vacuum before it is half full but there has never been any suction. It is useless, overpriced and i wish i had never bought it. I have just replaced it with a henry hvr 200-22, and am delighted with my new purchase.
Important, please be aware that:

| Helpful | Unhelpful | Agree | Disagree |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Total Respect: +1
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?