royal bank of scotland review

Picture courtesy of Mr Smith.

Average Ratings

Customer Service	2.9/10
Telephone Banking	2.6/10
Internet Banking	3.3/10
Local Branch	3.8/10
Cash Point Facility	4.4/10
Reviewer Rating	2.5/10
Overall Rating	2.4/10

23% Recommended5 out of 22 Reviews

• Overview
• Reviews
• Write your review
• Ask a Question

By rehmankhan on 13th Jun 2006

rehmankhan's Ratings

Overall value	3/10
rehmankhan's recommendation

Good Points

Prompt replies and neat environment

Bad Points

Rigid policies - inconsiderate towards customers
High charges

General Comments

I was a current account holder with the Royal Bank of Scotland for six-and-a-half years. During this period I have always abided by the banking laws, have never defaulted on any account and possess a clean / ideal credit-rating with all credit scoring agencies of Britain.

I have been selling a few household gadgets over the internet. During this course, I was victimised by fraudsters who sent me fake cheques as payment of goods they were purchasing from me. I deposited the cheques in my account to find that they were fake cheques issued by cheaters. As a result my bank account was frozen and I was asked to explain as to where did I get the cheques from. This happened three times in a year. Every time I co-operated with the bank by supplying their investigating team with a complete set of e-mails exchanged between me and the cheaters. I also provided the bank with the name and address of the person buying goods from me. Every time I was exonerated from all charges as I had nothing to do with making any such counterfeit document at any stage. At the request of the bank, I even went to the Police to register a complaint against a cheater who had tried to swindle me by supplying me with an illegitimate cheque. The Police, however, refused to register any such complaint, as neither of the concerned parties had registered any loss on any account.

Last of all, it was on 24th January 2006 that I received a cheque from America as payment for goods I had sold. Keeping in view the past negative experiences, I took the cheque personally to the Harrow Branch of Royal Bank of Scotland and explained to the Bank Officer on duty that I do not want to deposit this cheque in my bank account before verifying the same. I was told that there is no way that the Royal Bank of Scotland can verify whether a cheque is genuine or not without depositing the same in an account. I told the Officer on duty that I do not want my bank account to be affected in any way by depositing this cheque and hence I will not deposit this cheque until I am absolutely sure that this is a genuine document. I was advised that I should present this cheque for special clearance. This way my bank account will neither be affected and nor will the amount be credited into my bank account unless the cheque is cleared. The advice was followed only to find later that the cheque was a bogus document and that I have to get a new debit card immediately. The advice was observed.

On 27th March 2006, the Royal Bank of Scotland unilaterally decided to close my six-year old current account and wrote a letter informing me that this decision was non-negotiable. No reason was given in the letter as to why my account closed. I wrote a protest letter to the bank, but to no avail. The bank has refused to discuss this matter with me at any level.

Finally, as my account had an OD limit on it and I was overdrawn within the limits of my OD, I was asked to deposit the entire amount overdrawn of £2000 within seven days. I once again contacted the bank to ask for more time as it was not possible for me to repay the amount within such a short span. But the bank authorities were rigid and inflexible. I have now been served a default notice threatening me of passing the information about my indebtedness to credit reference agencies.

Now I am in a fix. I do not have the money to repay the bank in one go, and my credit-rating is at stake for no mistake of my own.

I decided to contact the Financial Ombudsman Service to file a complaint against this gross injustice. I was astonished to hear that the Financial Ombudsman cannot deal with a complaint concerning a bank's commercial judgement in a decision about lending or security. This includes decisions about risk and about other financial or commercial criteria. In such matters the Financial Ombudsman can only deal with complaints about maladministration by the bank. Maladministration may include a relevant mistake, undue delay, conflicting information or advice, improper discrimination or failure to follow bank procedures properly. In short, according to the Financial Ombudsman Service, the bank has the right to close a customer's bank account if it no longer wishes to offer the service to an individual. However, the bank should give the customer 28 days notice of closure to enable the customer to find alternative banking arrangements.

The questions to ponder from the episode narrated above are:
How can a consumer / member of the public find out whether the cheque he has received in the post is genuine or fake?
Why is a genuine account holder penalised for no mistake of his own?
Why can a bank in the UK close a bank account at any time without giving any reason what-so-ever?
Why can RBS threaten to destroy the credit rating of genuine account-holders, who are being victimised both by cheaters and the bank simultaneously?

In my opinion, this is an unjust practice and it must be stopped by amending the financial laws of the country. Any bank should not be allowed to penalise an account-holder unilaterally by closing his/her account without giving any reason. The Financial Ombudsman should be empowered to question banks' decisions about discontinuing provision of banking services to any individual, especially when the account holder is not at fault.

Important, please be aware that:

1. For each negative review there may be hundreds of satisfied customers.
2. None of the information is validated by Review Centre. Reviews are the opinions of the individuals concerned. All Content published is moderated to meet our Terms and Conditions.
3. We encourage companies to respond to negative reviews by using the comment facility at the bottom of the reviews.

rehmankhan's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!