William Golding, Lord of the Flies Review
Watch this item
From 7 ratings and 19 reviews
74% of users recommend this product
honored's Review of William Golding, Lord of the Flies
10th May 2006
Overall Rating
- Value for money

Lord of The Flies is a fantastic novel. It's allegorical character makes it faultless. It's truth has a universal significant. No wonder it won a Nobel Prize award.
Bad Points
Religion in the novel never tampered with the animalistic instinct in man. This is shown in jack who wears the cross in his neck. This Christian faith has radically transformed the brutal to the very loving and genial. So Golding's point here is questionable. Man is simply different from man.
General Comments
William Golding, Lord of the Flies- No government organisation, law, philosophy, science, technology, religion or refinement can convert the beast in man: human nature is simply bestial. This is central to an interpretation of Lord of The Flies. Simon sees the nature of the unfeeling pig's head, he sees man's nature in it but is never to tell his mates. He is the philosopher. Piggy is the rational or scientific type. He is not to last in the story. Ralph who represents good governance becomes the brutes' prey and himself becomes brutal in self-defence. The conch representing the rule of law is shattered.
Lord of the Flies, generally, is a quest into human nature. IT'S REALLY VERY ILLUMINATING.
honored's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Why Did William Golding Write Lord of the Flies- What Made William Golding Write Lord of the Flies
- Golding William Biography
- Facts about William Golding
- Books of William Golding
- William Golding Novels
- Chapter Summary of Lord of the Flies
- William Golding the Spire
- The Spire William Golding Notes
- William Golding Nobel Prize Author




Share this page: