Canon F-1 Review

Watch this item
Canon  F-1
4.4 stars
Average rating for this product is: 4.4 out of 5

From 3 ratings and 6 reviews

Thumb up 100% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item

Jeff.'s Review of Canon F-1 35mm SLR camera

Overall Rating

4.5 stars
  • Value for money
    5 stars
  • Features
    4 stars
Good Points

Durability, heft, system accessories (finders, motor drives/winders, screens, etc.), manual controls, mechanical shutter timing, Canon FD lens mount.


Bad Points

Age, weight.


General Comments

Canon has made three different cameras called F-1.

The F-1 and F-1n made from 1971-76 and 1976-81 are almost identical. Complete manual control (shutter, aperture, focus, depth of field preview, mirror lockup), mechanical shutter 1-1/1000, battery used for meter only. Battery is the discontinued Mercury cell PX625. Cheap hearing aid batteries can be substituted but life is short. Only a central rectangle in the image is metered (i.e., it's like a spot meter with a large spot). Lots of reasonably priced, very high quality Canon FD lenses are available on the used market. This camera is substantial (read "heavy"); its inertia makes it easier to hold steady for longer exposures. Retail price in the US is about $300.

The F-1N (1982-1996) is a different camera. It adds electronic shutter timing for the slow speeds, and exposure automation (aperture and shutter priority) with certain finders and motor drives. Mirror lockup was lost. Metering pattern depends on the screen used. Battery is lithium P28, still widely available. Accessories of the F-1N are not interchangeable with the earlier models. Retail price in the US is about $500.

These cameras were highly reliable when new. Many cameras on the used market haven't been used in a long time; they need to be cleaned and lubricated. If they weren't abused (dropped, dunked in seawater, or victimized by a DIY repairer), a clean and lube should be all they need to give a few more decades of service. The CLA should include replacement of mirror foam and light trap seals, which invariably have turned to goo on any camera over 20 years old.

I highly recommend all of the F-1 models, as long as you are prepared to carry a lot of weight in bodies and lenses.

Tweet This Review

On average, people found this review very helpful

How helpful did you find this review?


Members' Comments onJeff.'s Review

  • jimbo86s on 25th Jan 2004

    This is an amazing amount of background which personally helped me a lot in general with camera shopping.

  • oniko Rank: Major on 15th Jun 2004

    with canon going to auto focus, there is many high quailty FD lenses now on the market to use with these cameras.

    a 100mm 2.8 and 17mm 3.5 cost myself just under US $100.

    less extotics such as 135mm, 200mm, 28mm are now at give away prices.

    it is still very heavy gear, but the results are worth it.

  • cbrmac Rank: Lance Corporal on 6th Jul 2004

    Have to agree with the review haveing used the old F1 then the new F1 since it first came out and it has never failed to this day, a camera that if dropped down a flight of steps would no doubt still work a truely proffesional work horse, a camera built to this quality today would be out of the price range of all but a very select few, if someone owns a nice F1 it's seldom they part with them I still regard this camera the best canon ever made.