Picture courtesy of alehtone.
| Performance | 8.3/10 |
|---|---|
| Practicality | 8.8/10 |
| Reliability | 8.1/10 |
| Value for Money | 7.9/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 7.7/10 |
| Overall Rating | 7.5/10 |
By c c chan. on 2nd Mar 2003
| Performance | 8/10 |
|---|---|
| Practicality | 9/10 |
| Reliability | 8/10 |
| Value for money | 8/10 |
| Overall value | 8/10 |
| | |
The Nissan X-Trail 2.0 SE+ has good interior and exterior, correctly sized engine,
Lots of front brake dust, radio is non autotracking, poor windscreen glass quality.
I have this car for 5 months. Everything seems ok, except the above minor issues. But the windscreen upset me. It cracked the first week on ground. It had not been hit by anything, at least nothing big enough even to catch my attention. The dealer denied responsibilty but charge me $780 for the glass. My last Ford has 150000km without broken glass. I am not convinced that its all down to luck but not glass quality. Why should we accept auto makers to down grade their windscreens to become disposables?
Apart from this the Xtrail is worth the money.

| Helpful | Unhelpful | Agree | Disagree |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Respect: +2
Aserdjuk. on 16th Apr 2003