Fiat Coupe 20v Turbo Limited Edition Review

★★★★☆
4.3 / 5
92% of users recommend this
  • Performance

  • Practicality

  • Reliability

  • Value For Money

krishna102's review of Fiat Coupe 20v Turbo Limited Edition

☆☆☆☆☆

“When I got it I found out to my dismay that the Fiat...

Written on: 08/11/2005 by krishna102

Good Points
None

Bad Points
Everything and I actually bought it.

General Comments
When I got it I found out to my dismay that the Fiat Coupe 20v Turbo Limited Edition looked like it had already been in a car crash. The car is fast but I got bored driving it.

The interior had a combination of brown fabric and I rather walk from my home in Cornwall to work in London than drive another mile in it.

  • 1996

    Year Manufactured

  • 25 minutes

    Length of ownership

  • 2

    Doors

  • Performance

231279_Fredddy's Response to 216476_krishna102's Review

Written on: 23/02/2006

Please delete this review. Reviews are supposed to be objective..car performance / specific problems..

Reply to this comment

246365_Steven633's Response to 216476_krishna102's Review

Written on: 08/06/2006

To my knowledge Limited Edition Fiat Coupes come with red and black Recaro interior......... No brown in sight, trust me !!!!!!

Reply to this comment

246365_Steven633's Response to 216476_krishna102's Review

Written on: 08/06/2006

To my knowledge Limited Edition Fiat Coupes came with black and red Recaro leather interiors........no brown in sight....honest !!!!

Reply to this comment

Rubblegum's Response to 216476_krishna102's Review

Written on: 09/06/2006

Bored driving a 155Mph supercar? Something odd about this review as Coupes didn't come with 'brown fabric' interiors. Interior is black with a body coloured trim stripe and either black cloth fabric seats or leather in various colours, usually black or sometimes grey. European 1.8's (pre 1998) got tan leather and a few colour combinations not available in UK. Has this reviewer been within an Asses roar of a Coupe or his he a frustrated BMW driver??

Reply to this comment
Report this review