Nokia 6310 Review

Click here if this is your business
★★★☆☆
3.4 / 5
62% of users recommend this
Click here if this is your business
  • Features

  • Reception

  • Style

  • Value For Money

Riggs.'s review of Nokia 6310

★★☆☆☆
Nokia 6310

“I Have so far had my Nokia 6310 replaced 3 times! The...”

Written on: 26/01/2003 by Riggs. (1 review written)

Good Points
Light weight, attractive, good memory and battery life.

Bad Points
Software sucks!

General Comments
I Have so far had my Nokia 6310 replaced 3 times! The issue is always the same. It Crashes, loses signal for no reason, and keeps erasing all the last called/received numbers for no reason! I must say the people at the Nokia Centre are NOT helpful in anyway!

  • Value For Money

  • Features

  • Reception

  • Style

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Sword's Response to 68180_Riggs.'s Review

Written on: 03/01/2004

I don't know why his set giving problems but i'm using nokia 6310 for about a year and found to be an excellent set rather a class which the nokia corp has developed. It has an enormous battery time, dynamic memory, best signals,bluetooth & infrared connectivity...only bad point is that size is large as compared to today's generation sets.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Lucky's Response to 68180_Riggs.'s Review

Written on: 03/03/2004

I have owned the 6310 for 16 months now and think it\'s a great phone. I am now starting to experience problems with the call register\'s recieved calls\", displaying what it wants only...gives a message \"phone book not ready\".
<br>Can anybody please give me advice on what to do?

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Report this review