Saab 9-3 Aero Convertible 2.0T Auto 210 bhp 2005 Review

Watch this item
Saab 9-3 Aero Convertible 2.0T Auto 210 bhp 2005
4.5 stars
Average rating for this product is: 4.5 out of 5

From 6 ratings and 9 reviews

Thumb up 89% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item

austin's Review of Saab 9-3 Aero Convertible 2.0T Auto 210 bhp 2005

Overall Rating

4.5 stars
  • Value for money
    3 stars
  • Length of ownership
    3 Months
  • Performance
    4.5 stars
  • Reliability
    5 stars
  • Year Manufactured
    2005
  • Doors
    2
  • Practicality
    4 stars
Good Points

Sexy Looks
Exciting Performance
Comfortable seats
Interior space


Bad Points

Business Pack including phone and sat nav is useless.
Fuel Consumption
Dealer charges for loan car!


General Comments

I have had my Saab 9-3 Aero Convertible 2.0T Auto 210 bhp 2005 Sports Car for three month and it has been great fun. A real peformance car with good looks and good road manners that turns heads. Beware of the sat nav which is a heap of junk. It has no postcode search and for business users it is hopeless as there are no business parks listed. The integral phone is hopeless too. The sound quality is appalling when the car is moving. This option cost £1600. Forget it!

Tweet This Review

On average, people found this review very helpful

How helpful did you find this review?


Members' Comments onaustin's Review

  • revvyman Rank: Staff Sergeant on 1st Nov 2005

    I agree with your comments on the Sat Nav, My old Omega had a better system! Mine often locks up, the traffic info is unreliable and it is not as intuitive to use as some, and I agree it would be easier if you could locate by postcode as well as address.
    1 year and 18,000 miles later, I still would recommend this car, despite minor niggles with interior trim quality not quite being up to BMW/Audi standard.

  • Range rover man Rank: Corporal on 19th Feb 2007

    I agree with this review - my sat-nav + GSM phone are rubbish! I disagree with the bad fuel economy though!