HomeCall+ Home Emergency Insurance Review

Watch this item
HomeCall+ Home Emergency Insurance
3 stars
Average rating for this product is: 3 out of 5

From 2 ratings and 10 reviews

Thumb up 50% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item


the beckster's Review of HomeCall+ Home Emergency Insurance

30th May 2005

Overall Rating

5 stars
  • Value for money
    5 stars
  • Customer service
    5 stars
  • Have you made a claim?
    Yes
Good Points

National coverage, very quick response, no charge for direct debit payments, vetted tradesmen.


Bad Points

None really.


General Comments

Exert from energyhelpline.com:

'Cover for up to £500 for most home emergencies. Includes boilers, heating & hot water, lost keys, broken windows, plumbing, drains, electrics and vermin! 24 hour x 365 day per year service. NB. Boiler covered providing it is less than 10 years old and has been regularly serviced. Service available for £79.95 from Homecall+ when policy taken out.

HomeCall Plus home emergency cover plus an annual inspection / service for your boiler. NB. If boiler has not been regularly serviced full year premium will need to be paid upfront to pay for a boiler service and thus cover boiler.'

Tweet This Review

On average, people found this review very helpful

How helpful did you find this review?


Members' Comments onthe beckster's Review

  • cowleasow Rank: Lance Corporal on 16th Mar 2006

    I would not recommend this company. After cancelling a contract with them (without making a claim) they have now issued a default notice against me. Of course I shall fight this.

  • choonz Rank: Staff Sergeant on 12th May 2006

    just a quick comment on the previous comment, I have checked the t&c's and the minimum contract period seems to be 12 months

  • cowleasow Rank: Lance Corporal on 15th May 2006

    A quick comment on the previous comment. When my boiler was BROKEN and the company REFUSED to help I felt the only course was to cancel. The company have subsequently admitted in writing to me that they were at fault. I assume this "apology" was becuase I threatened them with the small claims court - they quickly backed down.