| Value for Money | 7.6/10  |
|---|---|
| Reviewer Rating | 7.4/10 |
| Overall Rating | 7.3/10  |
By Sooz on 1st May 2005
| Reviewers Network | Orange |
|---|---|
| Time Phone Owned | 1 - 6 Months |
| Screen Quality | 10/10 |
| Battery Life | 2/10 |
| Features | 5/10 |
| Reception | 10/10 |
| Style | 10/10 |
| Value for money | 0/10 |
| Overall value | 0/10 |
 Sooz's recommendation | |
Nice design/shape. Good pictures on camera.
Charger? Have to fiddle with connection to get phone to charge. Outside display no longer works has gone all scrambled, phone less than six months old!! Problem with charger was happening within weeks and carphone warehouse wouldn't exchange, would only send back to Motorola and that would take weeks. At 130 quid was not impressed.
Have always had a trusty Nokia, but decided I would like a change so tried Motorola V500. Phone is junk. Plastic scratches easily, charger does'nt connect properly after a few weeks, outside display has gone all scrambled, switches it self off, battery life poor. I am always careful with my phones my previous nokias are all in working order, my 3310 is being used by my partner and is still going strong after five years. My 3510 I use for work and is 3 years old battery still holds charge for 5 to 6 days. As soon as I have the money I will ditch this Motorola and will never buy that make again.
Sooz's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
