Have a picture of Volvo S60 D5 SE?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of Fidelio.
| Performance | 8.4/10 |
|---|---|
| Practicality | 8.2/10 |
| Reliability | 9/10 |
| Value for Money | 8.4/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 8.2/10 |
| Overall Rating | 7.5/10 |
By mavericks
on 3rd Jan 2005
| Year Manufactured | 2003 |
|---|---|
| Length of ownership | 10 Months |
| Performance | 7/10 |
| Practicality | 9/10 |
| Reliability | 10/10 |
| Value for money | 6/10 |
| Overall value | 4/10 |
| | |
Top design, good looks, lots of comfort and power, safe.
Poor build quality, drivers seat base changed twice. Air con/climate is a wast of space.
Turning circle is terrible.
This is my third Volvo, 850 estate and the last one was a Volvo S60 2.0t.
This car is not up to standard, the diesel is noisey, and the fuel economy on motorway journeys, does not come up to expectations at 36/37 per gal.
Climate control, cannot make its mind up what temp to supply.
Have had to have a new rear screen because the heater interfeard with the radio.
Drivers seat base has been replaced twice in 35000 miles as it dropped 2 inches.
In short, what have volvo done? Give me back my 187000 mile 850, and take this thing away.

mavericks's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
pshore
on 2nd Aug 2005
mavericks
on 4th Aug 2005
pshore
on 8th Aug 2005