Cannon 737 Review

Watch this item
Cannon 737
4.3 stars
Average rating for this product is: 4.3 out of 5

From 4 ratings and 20 reviews

Thumb up 90% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item


Aaron.'s Review of Cannon 737

2nd Dec 2002

Overall Rating

5 stars
  • Value for money
    4 stars
  • Handling
    3 stars
  • Accuracy
    5 stars
Good Points

The Cannon 737 air rifle is high power with long range and accuracy it is .177 calibre so pellets are cheep and easy to get ahold of. While the rifle has high velocities it is also has no recoil.


Bad Points

Having to pump it is a drag but thats what you pay for high velocities it may be dufficuilt for smaller build or younger people to get it up to 10 pumps which gives you just over 900 fps while 3 pumps will give you 600 fps which is still higher than a normal break barrel


General Comments

The Cannon 737 is a good quality air rifle at a good price. I've had mine for 2 years now and have only had 1 problem which was easily fixed at my local gun store. The wooden stock is durable and also the gun as it survived a drop of 5 metres when it fell off my deck. But all the positaves wipe out the negitaves to give you one of the most powerfull rifles on the market. Therefore i strongly recomend the cannon 737 to people who are looking at high power and accuracy which is needed for rabbits and stoats along with magpies and minors. The gun is more for the hunter than the person who is looking at informal plinking.

Tweet This Review

On average, people found this review very helpful

How helpful did you find this review?


Members' Comments onAaron.'s Review

  • Blackserpent Rank: 2nd Lieutenant on 7th Feb 2004

    Isn't it bad for the cannon 737 to pump it more than 10 times in order to have more power ?

  • Blackserpent Rank: 2nd Lieutenant on 21st Sep 2004

    Yes it is! It may short the life-time of the airgun. It's strongly advised to pump the Cannon NOT MORE THAN 7 times which makes the gun quite powerful...(this is written in the users Manuel, actually a piece of junk with very little information...