nikon coolpix 2100 review

Average Ratings
Value for Money	10/10
Overall rating	9.6/10

100% Recommended5 out of 5 Reviews

Quick Links: Write your review

Review of Nikon Coolpix 2100

Previous
Review 3 of 5
Next

By cujodisraeli on 20th Sep 2004

cujodisraeli's Ratings
Time Digital Camera Owned	6 - 12 Months
Image Quality	10/10
Battery Life	10/10
Features	10/10
Ease of Use	10/10
Value for money	10/10
Overall value	10/10
cujodisraeli's recommendation

Good Points

Small, only uses two batteries, takes top photos with minimum fuss. The ultimate compact digital camera.

Bad Points

None.

General Comments

When I got my Nikon Coolpix 2100 camera last december I compared it to my friends Canon A60 and found that the Canon A60 had more functions. Bugger, I sighed. However after using it for a couple of weeks i realised that the Nikon is by far the better camera, in fact the best camera in its group.

First and formeost, the whole reason of getting a camera is to take photos and this is something the Nikon does perfectly and with minimum of fuss. Turn it on, point and click and when you plug it into your telly or PC or you print them off you realise that the colour definition and clarity is unbeatable. The second big plus point is the fact it only uses 2 (rechargable) batteries which keeps it compact and light unlike the Canon. It also has a bucket load of features which are more than enough to get your teeth stuck into especially when this is your first digi camera.

The fact that it doesnt come with a case means nothing, its the camera that counts and in this case (no pun intended) the camera is awesome.