Have a picture of Nissan Micra K11 1.0?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of dan.
| Performance | 7.1/10 |
|---|---|
| Practicality | 8/10 |
| Reliability | 9/10 |
| Value for Money | 8.3/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 8.4/10 |
| Overall Rating | 8.4/10 |
By willywomabt
on 19th Sep 2004
| Year Manufactured | Not supplied |
|---|---|
| Length of ownership | Not supplied |
| Performance | 2/10 |
| Practicality | 3/10 |
| Reliability | 1/10 |
| Value for money | 2/10 |
| Overall value | 3/10 |
| | |
nippy; good sized boot; sturdy bodywork; easy to park;
elctrical failure; distributor problems; backache from driving; no clock; (quite annoying) no confidence to overtake as wonder if it will make it!
I was advised to buy a Nissan Micra because it is supposed to be the most reliable small car on the road but I must say I have not found this to be the case with my own model - an automatic Nissan Micra K11 1.0l, N reg. This is only my second car after an automatic Rover Metro 1.4 K reg, which did have tinny bodywork but never let me down (until someone smashed into the back of me and drove off (writing off said car).
With the Micra I've had a lot of electrical problems and also distributor problems. The car is not guaranteed to start first time - unlike the Metro. I may just be unlucky but I would not buy a Micra again. Am considering exchanging it for another Rover!
Important, please be aware that:

| Helpful | Unhelpful | Agree | Disagree |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Total Respect: -1
edlesschicken on 14th Apr 2005
rus3863 on 3rd May 2005
colzie on 13th Jun 2005
Annie Palmer on 27th Oct 2005