mitsubishi outlander 2.4 gls review

Picture courtesy of Deftoner.

Average Ratings
Performance8/10
Practicality9/10
Reliability10/10
Value for Money9.5/10
Reviewer Rating9/10
Overall Rating4.7/10 Based on 9 ratings
100% Recommended2 out of 2 Reviews

Review of Mitsubishi Outlander 2.4 GLS

By Jim Bo Rank: Lance Corporal on 29th Aug 2004

Jim Bo's Ratings
Year Manufactured2004
Length of ownership2 Months
Performance8/10
Practicality9/10
Reliability10/10
Value for money9/10
Overall value9/10
yes Jim Bo's recommendation

Good Points

The Outlander handles better than the Honda CRV that I drove in the wind.

Bad Points

Head rests are not at a comfortable angle.
Mirriors are to small.(Blind Spots)

General Comments

In general the Mitsubishi Outlander SUV was nice to drive on a 1800 mile break in trip. We had 2 adults and 2 children in the Outlander with the cargo area full of gear for a week trip.
The Outlander averaged 24 miles per gallon.
This was city and highway (some hills were in that average). I got as high as 27 mpg and as low as 19 mpg. Overall I would rate the car a 9 out of 10. Now have 2100 miles and all is well.

Jim Bo's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!

How have you found this review?



2 Comments on Review by Jim Bo for Mitsubishi Outlander 2.4 GLS


  1. deftoner Rank: Lance Corporal on 24th Apr 2006

    For the outside mirrors, a lot of reviewers from different sites actually think the mirrors are too big. I like the bigger mirror, definitely helps out in traffic.

  2. Hillsider69 Rank: Sergeant on 13th May 2006

    Is that US gallons or Imperial gallons? And for those who do not know the difference... Both are 8 pints, but.. An Imperial pint (i.e UK) is the volume of 20 oz water, and a US pint is 16 oz (one pound and more logical even tho' I'm a Brit)