Logun Mk1 .177 Review

Watch this item
Logun Mk1 .177
4.8 stars
Average rating for this product is: 4.8 out of 5

From 1 rating and 2 reviews

Thumb up 100% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item

gubby.'s Review of Logun Mk1 .177

Overall Rating

5 stars
  • Value for money
    5 stars
  • Handling
    5 stars
  • Accuracy
    5 stars
Good Points

Smooth action, Light weight,very accurate. Looks lovely!!


Bad Points

No safety. Loading can be fidley with .177 in the dark.


General Comments

I have been thinking of buying a pre-charged rifle for some time and decided to bite the bullet and spend some finance! After trying several others I decided I really wanted a Logun so I bought a Mk1 in .177 cal. I have just about fallen in love with this rifle. The action is as smooth as silk, it is whisper quiet and very, very accurate. I can get nice tight groups at 30 yards,(30ish meters for those who understand metric),and 50 yards with a bit more practice. My only criticism would be the lack of a safety catch and the magazine can be fidly to fill in the dark,(.177 and fingers like bananas). I have fitted a Logun bipod, Logun silencer and a Logun lamp which finnish it of a treat. I could be turning into a Logun fanatic :-)) Dispite the two little niggles I mentioned it is a superb gun that is a joy to own and shoot. If you can, buy one. You won't be disappointed.

Tweet This Review

On average, people found this review very helpful

How helpful did you find this review?


Members' Comments ongubby.'s Review

  • nicholasdownes Rank: Staff Sergeant on 28th Sep 2004

    Dear Sir,

    I am about to purchase a Logan MK1 professional rifle from a guy I know. He has had it since new & in the nine months we have shot together he has used it for 1hr. It’s immaculate, but, if you still have your MK1 how has it faired with the test of time? Would you still recommend I buy one? It’s a .22. Any comments would be appreciated as this represents quite an investment for me.

    Cheers,

    Nick.