Item: Johnson & Johnson No More Tears Shampoo
Rating: 5

Gaynor's review of Johnson & Johnson No More Tears Shampoo

“Johnson & Johnson baby shampoo has probably been the...”

★★★★★

written by Gaynor on 06/07/2004

Good Points
Pleasant delicate fragrance.
Leaves hair clean and fresh.

General Comments
Johnson & Johnson baby shampoo has probably been the most popular baby shampoo for many, many years. Johnson's baby shampoo is Soap-free, alcohol-free, hypoallergenic and allergy and dermatologist-tested and leaves hair clean and fresh.

The no more tears forumla will especially give new mums extra confidence when washing babies hair, though I still think it may be wise to avoid the shampoo going near the eyes. The clear yellow shampoo lathers up easily and has a mild fresh fragrance.

I have found Johnson's baby products popular, trustworthy and in-expensive and have used this product regularly on both my children over many years.

Johnson's have a large product range which are gentle and kind for babies and are also great for sensitive skin and general use.

Value For Money

write a review

Awaremom's Response to 127376_Gaynor's Review

Written on: 06/10/2005

This product has chemicals to numb the nerves in the eyes to counteract natural defenses. Will you still use it?

Reply to this comment

Rocksteady's Response to 127376_Gaynor's Review

Written on: 07/10/2005

I have had a bit of a look around on the internet and I don't think this is exactly true. All shampoos and soaps contain detergents - the thing that is different about no more tears shampoo is that the detergents are mixed and blended in a way that makes them less irritating to the eye.
 
 All the information I have found says there are no chemicals in the shampoo which numb the eye. The sites also said that even pouring clean water on the eye will cause the eye to run so there is a limit to how well these shampoos can work.
 
 There is a good Google answer that could explain this better than I can, you can find it by going to this address.
 http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=347982

Reply to this comment