Have a picture of Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Azkaban (PG)?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of Dan.
| Value for Money | 6.5/10  |
|---|---|
| Overall rating | 6.4/10 |
By slit
on 16th Jun 2004
| Starring Actor/Actress | Daniel Radcliffe |
|---|---|
| Where Did You See It? | Cinema |
| Value for money | 3/10 |
| Overall value | 2/10 |
 slit's recommendation | |
Tried to make it a comedy in my opinion.
The Prisoner Of Azkaban is the WORST of the three movies. I don't know what I expected, but this rubbish was NOT IT! The movie skipped many points, and tryed to make it MUCH more funny than J.K Rowlings intended it to be. Yeah, there were some funny parts in this book, but the movie tried to make it into a comedy/action movie, and failed miserably. I don't know about you, but Aunt Marge looked WAY different than I expected, same as of Prof. Trelawny, Sirius Black, and Lupin was a HUGE dissapointment. They made it look like all Lupin taught was Boggarts, and his looks were extremely dissapointing. I, and I am guessing you also, didn't expect Lupin to be in somewhat decent robes, be clean shaven, and have red hair. I expected shabby, patched robes, a "trying to look clean" look, and greying hair, that was originally black. The leaky cauldron was VERY stupid looking, and Tom (I think that was his name) in my mind, was not a dumb, slobbering hunchback. And I thought that Cornelius Fudge would very much resemble Bilbo Baggins, but no. This movie was a horrible interpretation of the book, and if the title were different, I would have thought it was a completely different movie altogether. DO NOT BUY THIS MOVIE!!! This was the worst of the three movies, and if the movies keep going downhill, I swear I'm gonna buy 'm just to stick 'm in the microwave, and let them spark, like AOL CD's.
| Helpful | Unhelpful | Agree | Disagree |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Total Respect: -1
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
Jockey Jock on 2nd Aug 2004