Have a picture of Diana P5 Magnum?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of norcal38.
| Value for Money | 8.1/10 |
|---|---|
| Reviewer Rating | 8/10 |
| Overall Rating | 8.1/10 |
By N Carson
on 24th Mar 2004
| Value for money | 8/10 |
|---|---|
| Overall value | 9/10 |
| | |
Accurate,
Smooth cocking and loading,
Nice styling,
Precise build quality.
Velocity is overstated.
The gun could be several inches shorter for quicker handling (shorter muzzle sleeve maybe).
They should make a version with a left-hand grip and corresponding left-hand finger-safety.
I agree with other reviewers who question the power-rating of the Diana P5 Magnum gun. I doubt the P5 Magnum is the most powerful (spring piston) pistol available. My Beeman P1, rated at 600 FPS in .177, packs noticeably more punch based on penetration tests with wood, cans, old books and general trajectory observations. The fact that the P5 is quieter attests to same; less pressure being forced down the barrel.
Lacking a chrono, I don't have specifics, but it appears that the P5 Magnum (aka RWS 5G Magnum) has about 80-90% of the Beeman P1's power. This conclusion is based on a P5 with about 100 rounds through it, so unless something drastic happens after further break-in, the "700 FPS" figure is misleading. They should rate it with pellets commonly used, not super-lights.
However, I think it's a fine gun and, by design, more accurate than the P1. It's also easier to cock and load than the P1 and the sleek styling adds to the enjoyment.

| Helpful | Unhelpful | Agree | Disagree |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Respect: +2
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
N Carson
on 30th Mar 2004
wertyq
on 30th Mar 2004
N Carson
on 14th Apr 2004
shoot2kill
on 12th Feb 2006
N Carson
on 2nd Mar 2006
theshootist
on 30th May 2007